Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John Smithson's avatar

Very interesting and thought-provoking story. But I find the idea that we are all bags of bitchy, demanding enzymes to be as misleading as Richard Dawkins's idea of the selfish gene, and for the same reason. These ideas assume an evolutionary process that cannot, and therefore does not, exist.

I raised this issue with you before, talking about how evolution could not have produced the Omicron variant through any neo-Darwinian process. Your answer was a thoughtful one, but I think it was wrong. We don't need to overthink these things, but I don't think we are. I think we're underthinking them.

For example, the issue with a homeostatic process is not what enzymes are used in that process, but how those enzymes are structured to carry out the function they do. They form a complex system that is more than the sum of its enzymatic parts. Where does that system design come from? That is worth thinking, and overthinking, about.

Expand full comment
Momo's avatar

Love it. What materialists rarely attempt to explain, though, is exactly how the intricacy of this awesome mess proves it semi-randomly mutated itself into existence, rather than being driven by a transcendent mover or telos.

Expand full comment
47 more comments...

No posts